By Nouf Bazaz
A cesarean section (known as a C-section) is a major abdominal surgery and should not be taken lightly. In cases where it is absolutely necessary, it can be a lifesaving technique. However, in the United States, one out of every three babies is born through a C-section despite the WHO recommendations that the rate should never be above 10-15%. A C-section not only interferes with the natural childbirth process but can also pose great risks to both mother and child.
C- sections are performed for four main reasons: repeat cesarean, non-progressive labor or dystocia, breech presentation and distress. However, a medical study found that the rate of cesareans in low-risk women is steadily increasing across every demographic. [1] This indicates that the criteria for what warrants a C-section has changed. For example, more careful diagnosis and better management of dystocia could halve the C-section rate. In one study when the labor was termed “non-progressive” and a C-section was performed, 77% of those women were able to have a vaginal birth for a subsequent birth. One third of the women delivered babies that were larger than in the first instance that had apparently warranted a C-section. The epidural may also be another cause of cesareans associated with dystocia.
Over the years, a culture has evolved that is much more lax in regards to the C-section and women may not understand the risks involved. Some women even elect to have a cesarean because it is considered more convenient and painless. In some cases, women who have diabetes are even led to believe that they need a C-section despite the fact that diabetes is not the only factor that should be considered. [2] Healthcare providers are also more inclined to do a C-section because of the risks of malpractice lawsuits associated with problems during vaginal births. Women and healthcare providers alike are then cornered into a maternal health system that greatly endangers newborns. The maternal mortality rate is two to four times higher with a C-section than with a vaginal birth. There is also a great risk of infections, hemorrhage, transfusion, injury to other organs and anesthesia complication. After the C-section, early interaction with the newborn can be delayed and there is a six to eight week recovery period afterwards. In 1987 when the rate of C-section was similar to today, it was found that half of the C-sections conducted were unnecessary and resulted in 25,000 serious infections, 1.1 million extra hospital days and a cost of over $1 billion.
Vaginal Birth After Cesarean (VBAC) is another highly contentious matter. In the past, vaginal birth was not possible after a C-section under any circumstances lest the scar from the C-section may tear. However, today over 60-80 percent of women have a successful VBAC. In fact, a VBAC is may be a safer option than a subsequent C-section. Depending on the incision of the original C-section, you may be a candidate for a VBAC.